Even though we do not oficially adopt any textbook for Honors Calc III, you may find it convenient to get a textbook. Here are some basic hints to guide your choice: All calculus textbooks at this level are more or less obese, more or less overpriced, more or less cloned from each other, and more or less uninspiring. You will identify class material by subject names and can find matching stuff in most textbooks. You may want to get used older editions for a cheaper price, but restricted availability prevents me from adopting one particular older edition of one particular book. I assign my own hwk, so we do not need textbook uniformity for hwk purposes. The following books have been used at UT for 247 in the past: -- Varberg, Purcell, Rigden (goes for 147-148-247) -- Hurley: Multi-variable Calculus (this one is out of print with very restricted availability.) The following is a classic, which will certainly work: -- Marsden, Tromba: Vector Calculus We are using -- Stewart Calculus (Concepts and Contexts) for our non-honors sequence, and I see no reason against using it for Honors as well. Only be aware that for maybe one week of class, when we are doing `total derivative', the depth of Stewart will fall short of the course. Among these, Marsden-Tromba is probably closest to the course, with Varberg-Purcell-Rigden a close follower. Hurley is somewhat similar to the Calc-3 part of Varberg-Purcell-Rigden, but I am quite unhappy with the geometry-defying introduction of the gradient in this book. There is one more book you might consider to choose, but I need to be very specific which expectations it will and will not satisfy: It is -- John H. Hubbard, Barbara Burke Hubbard: Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra and Differential forms. The 2d edition is from Prentice Hall, the 3rd edition from matrixeditions.com 30% of the book fit maybe 2/3 of Math 247, another 30% could be a good fit for an Honors linear algebra course like our 257, and the rest goes beyond these courses. The authors cater for an approach which would integrate our 247 and 257 into a 2-semester sequence. If you expect a textbook that serves its purpose during a course and then goes out for resale, then you should NOT consider this book. If you like a book for keeps to which you will return for more details and connections with more advanced material during the rest of your UG years, and if you are also taking or will be taking 251 or 257, then you should consider the book. It's a real gem. However there will be parts of the lecture (multivariable integrals) which the book doesn't cater for, because it covers this material at more advanced level than the 247 course. If you can rely primarily on the lecture, then this should not be a big drawback. (I will likely throw in *some* xeroxed material of my own in this part of the course anyways.) Be aware that there is a merit in studying MV calculus and linear algebra together as a unity. The setup of our curriculum (and of many universities) does not support this unity. If you have a reference to which to return while and after studying these two courses, you can regain this unity and be so much better prepared for grad studies or 400 level courses. That's what I recommend the Hubbard^2 book for. If you need a book that duplicates the lecture and would rather not rely on the lecture alone, then Hubbard^2 would not work so well for you.